Methodologic Guidelines for Review PapersPDF DocumentThis document is only available as a PDF document. Use the following link to open it in your PDF viewer:
SummaryReading a good review paper is one of the most efficient ways of becoming familiar with state-of-the-art research and practice on any topic in cancer biology, epidemiology, prevention, or treatment. Yet, what constitutes a good review? It must be clearly organized, recently written by a knowledgeable (ex-pert) scientist, and describe a topic appropriate to the general readership of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. A 10-year methodologic discussion, however, suggests that there is more to the quality of reviews than judgments about writing style, author’s expertise, and choice of topic (1-18). Review papers are sources of scientific information and should be read (and written) with specific methodologic considerations in mind. The purpose of this editorial is to propose a set of guidelines for reviews submitted to the Journal, a general oncology journal. |
This Page Last Updated2005-12-07
Site Contents
|
![[PDF]](/Images/Icons/32/pdf.png){kind=icon}